![]()  | 
| EEOC 35th Anniversary Art Contest Chelsea Lapp, Age 11 Sixth Grade Flying Hills Elementary School El Cajon, CA  | 
We have learned much over the past several decades about the connection  between gender inequality and economic growth, particularly when we talk  about inequalities in education and employment. Inequalities in  education, for instance, artificially reduce the pool of talent which  societies can draw from; by excluding qualified girls from the  educational stream and promoting less qualified boys, the average amount  of human capital in a country will be reduced and this will have an  adverse impact on economic performance. We also know that the promotion  of female education leads to lower births per women, not only because  educated women will have greater knowledge about family planning but  also because education creates greater opportunities for women that may  be more attractive than childbearing.
Lower fertility levels help reduce child mortality and expand the range  of educational opportunities available to the next generation. All of  these factors combine to boost economic growth. Indeed, the effects of  lower fertility levels associated with improved female education have  long-lasting effects and deliver a “demographic dividend” a couple of  decades later. With reduced fertility levels the working-age population  will grow more rapidly than the overall population and this will boost  per capita economic growth.
Yet another powerful driver of economic growth associated with the  narrowing of employment gender gaps has to do with the “bargaining power  within families.” Not surprisingly, when women work and earn income as a  result, they will be more empowered within the home. Beyond the direct  personal benefits to her, the economics literature has identified a  number of other favorable effects such as higher savings, more  productive investments and better use and repayment of credit, all of  which are beneficial for economic growth. Other studies have shown that  with greater female power within the household there will be higher  investments in the health and education of children, thereby planting  the seeds for the accumulation of human capital in the next generation.
A further avenue of influence has to do with growing evidence that women  workers are less prone to corruption and nepotism than men workers. The  criminology literature, for instance, has long established that “the  most consistent pattern with respect to gender is the extent to which  male criminal participation in serious crimes at any age greatly exceeds  that of females, regardless of the source of data, crime type, level of  involvement or measure of participation.” [1] More recently, a survey of 6,500 companies carried out in the United  Kingdom looking at the gender composition of company boards showed clear  evidence that companies with greater female participation in boards  were less likely to be hit by governance scandals involving bribery,  fraud and other factors likely to depress business confidence.[2] So, boosting the employment of women is likely to be beneficial for  economic growth through improvements in the quality of governance.
Of course, while governments have played a central role over the past  century in the creation of a legal framework that has placed important  limitations on women’s ability to contribute meaningfully to the economy  or that have shaped in some adverse way her economic surroundings (see  the Women, Business and the Law report for a detailed compendium across 143 countries of the ways in  which this has been done), there are many other forms of discrimination  embedded in the law, that go well beyond issues of gender. 
Article 20 of the Constitution of Iran establishes that all citizens of  Iran have to be “in conformity with Islamic criteria.” Hence, members of  the Baha’i community, Iran’s largest religious minority, are denied  access to schools and universities, barred from public sector  employment, and face severe work restrictions in virtually every other  sector of the economy. In Lebanon, groups such as Baha’is, Buddhists,  and Hindus may own property and assemble for worship, but may not marry,  divorce, or inherit property within the country. The Uganda  Anti-Homosexuality Act of 2014 punishes “aggravated homosexuality” with  life imprisonment and the “offence of homosexuality” with a prison  sentence of up to 14 years.
There is clearly a role for government to create the enabling conditions  for a sound economy and an equitable society that makes efficient use  of the natural, economic and human resources available to it to meet the  needs and ensure the well-being of everyone. Poverty is one indicator  of government failings in this area. Despite the rapid growth  experienced in several developing countries over the past few decades,  more than 1 billion people still live in extreme poverty, and inequality  is increasing around the world.
The World Bank has committed to achieving the twin goals of eliminating  extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity. These goals go hand in  hand with equality of opportunity and the inclusive participation of all  segments of society in the economic and social spheres. Poverty is  often greatest in traditionally marginalized groups, and various forms  of discrimination can greatly depress the prospects for its alleviation.
The most sustainable path towards ending extreme poverty and promoting  shared prosperity is through creating an inclusive society, allowing  everyone, including traditionally marginalized groups such as ethnic,  religious, and other minorities, the same opportunity to participate in  and benefit from the economy. Governments have a critical role in  creating a foundation for equality of opportunity, both through  dismantling laws, regulations and policies which actively discriminate  against certain groups, and through adopting and promoting mechanisms  enhancing the enforcement of anti-discrimination legislation.
Prosperity involves more than just increasing and distributing wealth.  Human well-being includes social, cultural, ethical and spiritual  dimensions. The diversity and additional perspectives contributed by  presently marginalized groups can, when allowed full expression and  participation, enrich the community and society and add to collective  prosperity. Equality of opportunity not only prevents a waste of human  resources and capacities, but also opens the potential to even higher  levels of social and economic well-being.
__________________________________
